What determines willingness to take preventive actions in areas experiencing severe flooding?

Tadeusz Tyszka, Roman Konieczny

Abstrakt


The present research investigated the perception of the flood threat and willingness of inhabitants of regions experiencing regular severe floods to take preventive actions.

Residents of two type of regions were compared: those living in a region protected by flood levees vs. residents living unprotected regions. Inhabitants of the area protected by the levees resulting in the rare experience of flood, perceived probability of flood as lower and  reported higher willingness to take preventive actions than inhabitants of the area unprotected by levees. Similarly as in many previous studies personal experience and social norms turned out to be crucial factors in determining self-protective behavior. On the other hand unlike in other studies, we found no relationship between decision makers’ willingness to take preventive actions and factors related to threat appraisal, such as the perceived magnitude of loss and the perceived probability of damage. Finally, we found that the impact of a given factor on willingness to protect oneself against a hazard may depend on the kind of measure of the protective behavior.

The present research investigated the perception of the flood threat and willingness of inhabitants of regions experiencing regular severe floods to take preventive actions.

Residents of two type of regions were compared: those living in a region protected by flood levees vs. residents living unprotected regions. Inhabitants of the area protected by the levees resulting in the rare experience of flood, perceived probability of flood as lower and  reported higher willingness to take preventive actions than inhabitants of the area unprotected by levees. Similarly as in many previous studies personal experience and social norms turned out to be crucial factors in determining self-protective behavior. On the other hand unlike in other studies, we found no relationship between decision makers’ willingness to take preventive actions and factors related to threat appraisal, such as the perceived magnitude of loss and the perceived probability of damage. Finally, we found that the impact of a given factor on willingness to protect oneself against a hazard may depend on the kind of measure of the protective behavior.


Słowa kluczowe


flooding; natural hazards; preventive actions; risk; personal experience; social norms.

Pełny tekst / Download full text:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Cutter, S., & Barnes, K. (1982). Evacuation behavior and Three Mile Island. Disasters, 6, 116-124.

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Huettel, S.A., Mack, P.B., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: Dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5(5), 485-490.

Kievik, M.,& Gutteling, J.M. (2011). Yes, we can: Motivate Dutch citizens to engage in self -protective behavior with regard to fl ood risks. Natural Hazards, 59, 1475-1490.

Kundzewicz, Z.W. (1999). Flood protection – sustainability issues. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 44, 559-571.

Kunreuther, H.C. (1978). Disaster insurance protection. Public policy lessons. New York, NY: Wiley.

Loewenstein G., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.

Lerner J.S., Li Y., Valdesolo P., Kassam K.S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799-823.

Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2012). The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifi cations and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32, 616-632.

Major, A.M. (1993). A test of situational communication theory: Public response to the 1990 Browning earthquake prediction. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11, 337-349.

Miceli, R., & Sotgiu, I.M. (2008). Disaster preparedness and perception of fl ood risk: A study in an alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 164-173.

Mileti, D.S., & Darlington, J.D. (1997). The role of searching in shaping reactions to earthquake risk information. Social Problems, 44, 89-103.

Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.

Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2008). Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: People cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe fl ood. Risk Analysis, 28, 771-778.

Schade, C., Kunreuther, H.C., & Koellinger, P. (2012). Protecting against low-probability disasters: The role of worry. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 534-543.

van der Pligt, J. (1998). Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 1-14.

Weinstein, N.D. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 31-50.

Wilde, G.J.S. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2, 209-225.

Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A., & McCalley, T. (2009). Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: Flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 29, 1759-1778.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.68

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.